MORE THAN A NICE SCENT!
Newsletter No.49
28.08.25

Welcome Video:
Welcome to the 49th edition of the More Than A Nice Scent
Hello fragrance friends!
I want to share some research that proves something I've always believed: fragrance is emotional, but even more important, it’s identity-driven.
A fragrance being ‘beautiful’ predicts nothing about whether people will actually wear it.
Today’s essay explains the 77% factor. Why incredible perfumes often fail while something like Eccentric Molecule 01 became a hit. And how you can turn this knowledge into your creative advantage.
Warm regards,
Scott
Listen here for the audio version of this edition's feature essay:
The feature essay:
The 77% Secret No Perfumer Talks About
You've created a beautiful fragrance. It's balanced. Elegant. Technically solid.
It gets compliments. It gets shelf space. People say, "This smells amazing."
But six months later... nothing. No one's talking about it. No one's buying more.
That's because most fragrances target the wrong part of the brain.
Brazilian researchers found out why this happens. They studied 492 women in controlled lab conditions and discovered something huge: 77% of our decision to buy a fragrance comes from factors most perfumers completely ignore.
Our emotional responses to scent are never just about the scent itself. They're about what that scent means to us personally. This is exactly one of the main principles I built my Emotional Fragrance Design (EFD) framework around.
So if you're not designing for emotion, you're designing to be forgotten.
This is the missing piece most perfumers overlook.
Let me show you what the researchers found and how to use it in your own work.
More Than A Nice Scent
Here's what that 77% actually means.
The Brazilian researchers built a model that could predict if a consumer would buy a fragrance. They based it purely on emotional responses to what people saw, smelled, and touched. Not logical thinking. Not price. Not brand name. Just the feelings triggered by the sensory experience.
That model explained 77% of the decision-making process.
Think about that for a second. That's not guessing. That's science showing emotion drives most purchasing decisions. Imagine what you could do if you could influence the core emotional reactions that shape 77 out of 100 buying decisions.
But here's where it gets interesting for us. The researchers found a critical gap: a fragrance just smelling "good" had almost no power to predict whether it would be purchased and loved.
Women in the study could smell a fragrance, say it was beautiful, appreciate the artistry but still never want to wear it. The pleasant experience didn't create emotional attachment. It didn't predict buying.
Why? Because when someone experiences a fragrance, they're not just judging how it smells. They're asking themselves: "Does this feel like me? Does wearing this make me feel like who I want to be?"
This happens because fragrance emotions connect directly to something deeper: our identity. Not just any emotions. Specifically emotions about yourself. How you see yourself. How you want others to see you. Who you're becoming.
This identity connection is completely personal. I've watched my wife and her best friend the same age, same income, same lifestyle have opposite reactions to the same fragrance. One felt confident wearing it. And the other says 'Sure it's nice, but not for me.'"
The 77% factor shows that emotional attachment to fragrance is personal. Not just emotional. It's personally emotional. The kind of response that makes someone say "This is so me" instead of just "This smells nice."
This changes our entire design process. Instead of creating universally nice fragrances, you need to understand specific identity patterns. What makes a confident person feel more confident? What helps a creative person get in touch with their artistic side? What gives an ambitious person that extra edge?
Because that 77% isn't about creating nice experiences. It's about creating identity experiences. You "love your fragrance when it becomes a tool for self-expression, not just something that smells good.
This Shouldn't Have Worked
Look at Eccentric Molecules' Molecule 01. Technically, it broke every rule of traditional perfumery. It wasn't built as a balanced composition. It's just one ingredient: Iso E Super.
On paper, it shouldn't have worked. But it became a global cult hit. Why? One reason might be because it gives people a secret power they can't explain. I call it magnetic confidence.
Here's what makes it brilliant: it amplifies your natural scent rather than covering it up. You don't smell like a perfume. You smell like an improved version of yourself. That authenticity is key for identity connection.
Even though many people say they can't smell it, strangers keep complimenting them.
Not just any strangers. People who have no reason to be nice. Taxi drivers start conversations. Coworkers who never notice anything suddenly ask what they're wearing. People on elevators lean closer and seem friendlier.
This proves the concept perfectly. Even though they can't always smell what others react to, they love the attention and magnetism. And this changes how they see themselves. It feels good to be noticed.
The Second Skin Effect
Now that we understand how Molecule 01 creates this "magnetism" effect, let's design a simple blend that amplifies and enhances Iso E Super's super power.
First let's talk about Iso E Super. What it is and how it really smells.
Iso E Super (Magnatism): A smooth, velvety wood note. Think of silky cedar and amber. Very modern and diffuse. The opposite of a earthy natural cedar wood oil. It's a synthetic molecule that smells different to different people. Some smell it clearly. Others barely smell it at all.
Now we know what we're working with let's enhance it by creating some simple accord with some Hedione and Helveltolide:
Hedione (Radiance) is well-known for its light jasmine-like scent, but its influence extends beyond just adding a floral touch to fragrances. Its also has a delicate, slightly citrusy, transparent, airy character that fits beautifully in all kinds of unisex, masculine, and feminine perfumes. When we combine it with Iso E Super, it increases the emotional energy level of Iso E Super and its radiance.
Helveltolide (Softness): Think of a clean, white musk with a hint of ambrette seed. It creates an intimate and modern soft-second skin effect. When we combine it with Iso E Super, it adds a touch of comfort and softeness.
Experimenting with these three materials let us design different versions of magnetic confidence:
- Heavy Hedione + Light Helvetolide = Optimistic presence that energizes and attracts.
- Light Hedione + Heavy Helvetolide = Intimate confidence that draws people closer.
- Equal Hedione + Helvetolide = Queit condidence that's completely approachable.
Each ratio transforms Iso E Super's magnetism into a specific type of identity enhancement. This is exactly what designing for the 77% emotional core looks like in practice. Creating identity experiences, not just nice scents.
This Changes Everything
The importance of the 77% research are clear: deep emotional connection comes from the perception of identity enhancement, not just beautiful scents. Molecule 01 succeeded because it helps fill an identity need. It made people feel mysteriously confident. And that feeling can be more valuable than the actual scent for many people.
Once you understand this, everything changes. You stop asking only "What smells good?" and start asking "What makes someone feel powerful?" "What makes someone feel happy?" "What makes them feel ambitious?"
This is the difference between creating something people like and something they can't live without. Designing for a specific identity experience rather than just a nice smell opens up a completely different creative path.
But it requires changing how you think about every step of your process.
- Am I just blending notes, or am I building an emotional story?
- Who am I creating this for? What identity am I trying to enhance?
- How can I move beyond creating something that "smells amazing" to something that feels essential to someone. Something that makes them say "This is me"?
These are the questions that make a difference. A difference between "liking" and "loving" a fragrance.
It's clear to me that this research confirms the importance of a framework like EFD. That's why in my upcoming book, we'll break down this framework piece by piece. We'll move from emotional theory to the basics of perfumery to design for the secret 77% emotional core.
Missed an Issue?
No Problem! Click here to catch up!
Just for Fun!

Join the Conversation!
Please let me know what you’re thinking. Which identity do you most want to capture in your next composition: ambitious, creative, romantic, something else?

This really is great, certainly another way to create with more depth. I’m the same when purchasing fragrance, it has to give me a feeling. The day I purchased my first bottle of Chanel No22, it was an immediate feeling of lux. Fragrance transports you. Anyway, I could go on, I won’t. When is your book going to be published?
Hi Victoria!
Thank you so much for sharing. Yes, these concepts also apply to choosing fragrances. When I think of luxury, I try to look beyond price tags and status symbols. Lux can mean so many things to different people. For me, it’s all about indulging in that quiet satisfaction. Like treating myself to something rare and unique, something not everyone has access to. And your choice of No.22 is a perfect example. It’s timeless, elegant, and beautiful.
To be honest, I thought I’d have the book finished by now, but I’ve decided not to rush it. It’s turning into something I’m truly proud of, so I’m taking the time it needs to make sure it’s worth the wait.
Thanks for responding Scott. Okay, I wait patiently for the book to come out, I’m excited to read it. Will it be an e-book only?
Scott, next I’m planning a mixed media floral oriental and I want it to reflect female inner power and to express that as confidence
Hi Beverley,
A mixed media floral oriental – that sounds cool. What do you have in mind?